Mandatory vaccinations: No middle ground
Published: 2011"Few issues generate such impassioned debate as mandatory vaccination policies. Advocates say vaccines are safe and exemptions should be minimal. Opponents counter that vaccines are hazardous to health and that any limitation on exemptions is a violation of constitutional rights.
“Immunizations are the safest, longest-lasting and most effective way to prevent communicable diseases,” says Dr. Ian Gemmill, past chair of the Canadian Coalition of Immunization Awareness and Promotion, a nongovernmental advocacy organization." - Mandatory vaccinations: No middle ground (part of a three-part series on mandatory vaccination)
Part 1: Mandatory vaccinations: The Canadian picture
Part 2: Mandatory vaccinations: The international landscape
Product Type: Article
Category:
Policy,Immunization Policies,Mandatory Immunization and Activities PolicyImmunization Policies
Mandatory Immunization and Activities
Resource Rating Breakdown
Ratings submitted by CANVax users for this resource are tallied to provide an average resource rating per category.
0 Comments
Using the comment box below, provide your feedback for this resource. Tell the immunization community how you used the resource, what worked, what didn't and the changes you made. The feedback provided will help inform the immunization community and improve upon the resource made available on CANVax.
All comments are anonymous. Submitted comments will be reviewed for approval by the CANVax team to ensure it meets content submission guidelines. Please note that although CANVax aims to approve comments in a timely manner, volume may result in delays.
You must login or register before you can submit a comment.